There have been a couple of articles in Time during the last
month about boys. I used to be one of those, perhaps I even still am, so I
found them interesting.
The first article included a study of teenage boys, their
behavior, and how things have changed for boys in the last couple of
generations. As the article pointed out, this filled a gap in the literature.
For there have been study after study of teenage girls, and nothing like the
same attention to boys.
Interest in girls has followed the revolution of feminism
since the 1960’s. It is clear that this gave young women many opportunities, at
least in the part of the world where the revolution has not been held back.
These opportunities, coupled with developments in technology such as social
media, drove many changes in behavioural norms and a number of challenges.
I saw this clearly with my daughter, now twenty-four, and
was able to celebrate teenage years with her that had fewer constraints than
those of her mother or grandmother. Her generation, at least in Europe, had the
benefit of not being limited in their educational or career choices, and of
many more social freedoms.
The young women of today can choose their attitude and their
style. They can choose when to be active and when passive, and it is now more
acceptable for women to take the lead with boys. There are alternative role
models available to Barbie. Millennial young women can thank earlier feminist
icons for suffering through the hard yards to make this possible.
In my experience, the results are overwhelmingly positive.
Characters bloom. Diversity flourishes. Confidence emerges. My daughter had few
hang ups about her own sexuality and how to handle herself with men. Feminism
helped, and so did the rise of social media. As a thirteen-year-old, she
escaped to her room as often as possible to connect on MSN, to flirt and
experiment harmlessly with boys, and, equally importantly, to compare notes and
feelings with other girls.
As a parent, I was always at least one step behind. Each
time I found the courage to try to throw in some worldly wisdom, I was too
late, as the wisdom had already been learned from peers.
The new world of opportunity for young women still has its
challenges. Social media can be indescribably bitchy, perpetuate clans and
create winners and losers. At one stage, more than half of the girls in my
daughter’s class were seeing the doctor or taking some medication for
psychological issues. Mild depression was common.
All of this has been well documented. Crucially, girls, with
their more open way of observing and sharing feelings with each other, have
been able to find their way. And adults have also found a way to respond. The
embarrassing grandma, with inappropriate remarks about virginity and marriage,
has largely vanished, and even Walt Disney films start to portray more balanced
female figures.
This is all great. But what about boys? The article suggests
that boys have been subjected to just as much of a revolution, but that
attitudes and responses have not followed suit, leaving generations of
suffering kids. I tend to agree.
Start with the embarrassing granddad. He still exists and
has not changed. A young teenage boy is still expected to sow wild oats, while
not doing anything granddad wouldn’t do and staying out of trouble. In other
words, the boy is expected to be the same unthinking, sex-obsessed, feral
creature that I was expected to be.
This stereotype was damaging even in my day. I may have been
sex-obsessed, but I had no idea what to do with that obsession, and had all
sorts of false notions about my role, about girls and about consequences. The
result was paralysis, acne, and awful hang-ups that persist to this day. I was
not alone in this pain, but, true to my gender, I suffered it in silence, running
away from any advice and any analysis of my own feelings.
But, tough as it was in my day, now it is worse, since all
sorts of expectations have become jumbled up. Boys can still just as easily
fall in love, and be just as easily hurt, but the road now is packed with new
obstacles. Girls are allowed to behave differently. Social media speeds
everything up. A humiliation can be much more public.
So the journey is tougher, but the map remains rudimentary.
Advice from seniors still resembles the unhelpful embarrassing granddad. Peers
are available, but boys find it much harder to share their feelings. Rather
than ask each other questions, they tend to bombast and bullying to hide their
true feelings. As a result, an exaggerated hierarchy develops among the boys,
and winners and losers become more extreme. Inept at playing the new game with
girls, they resort too easily to the weapons they do have, intimidation or
running away. Fewer boys see the doctor, but more boys become seriously
depressed and even take their own lives.
So the scene I witness in my own house daily becomes the
norm. The girl is on facebook and her mobile phone, flirting, sharing and
learning, as well as occasionally suffering. But the boy is hiding behind a
computer game, locking away anything more real or more threatening.
Sadly, the article is at its weakest when advising us
parents what to do about the issue. I can work out myself that perpetual
questions will be greeted as warmly as my mother’s public questioning about my
spots. I can guess that finding a quiet time and inviting confidence is the
goal, but I didn’t pick up many hints about how to attain it. Perhaps there are
no easy answers, and we just have to wait to see him find his own solutions.
I can conclude that more studies might help, and I thank
Time for sharing one study. As with many issues, awareness is half the battle
and it also helps to know that others have the same experiences. Even though on
balance opportunity in life is still greater for boys compared with girls, even
in developed countries, I think the balance of emotional challenge has begun to
shift against the boys.
True equality of opportunity was the subject of the second
article, and the global experiment is Sweden. There any gender difference is
challenged, especially in early childhood. I remember this well. I lived in
Stockholm and I observed the effects.
I support this movement unreservedly. Yet it gives me
qualms. When I lived in Stockholm, it was noticeable that women were more
confident than men. Even physically, women walked tall while men cowered.
It is possible to hypothesise an ugly future for this
experiment. Is it possible that within a couple of generations of this
cowering, Swedish men would become infertile? It certainly felt that way to me.
At the time, this made me fear for the experiment and a part of me wished it
would be rolled back in time.
But reading the two articles together enabled a second
response. The experiment is just and correct and we should all advocate for it
to continue, to accelerate and to spread around the world. Start in practical
places like childcare provision, maternity leave and working hours.
Then add a missing ingredient. Help the men. Start by
helping the boys as they mature to understand how to succeed in the new
environment. The feminist revolution – wonderful yet incomplete though it is –
has created a new need – for men. Solve the trouble with boys, and the
revolution can proceed with confidence.
I wish a happy Christmas and blessed 2014 to everyone. I have
just now succeeded in one resolution I made last New Years Eve, to write three
blog posts per month. That was not so hard. Yet it was a typically male
resolution, as did not challenge my feelings or require any vulnerability.
Still, successes should be celebrated. I hope you have had your own successes
in 2013 to celebrate.
No comments:
Post a Comment