Sometimes I
really do think I inhabit a different planet to everyone else. A few months ago
a choir colleague directly accused me of this by when I expressed disinterest
in viewing the Star Wars film. That comment made me take notice and reflect.
What was extraordinary was that this was a group of narrow specialists that I
identified with closely; they were people like me, or at least people with an
important common interest. If they thought I belonged on Mars or somewhere
else, what would normal people think?
Often, I’ll
have an experience where I just struggle to comprehend or empathise in any way
with the feelings of those around me. I recall recently sitting in the café of
a huge mall in Toronto, with some relatives. It was clear to me that this place
was somewhere they loved, somewhere they would want to spend a large part of
their life. They were in their element, and even their conversation seemed to
be foreign to me, with lots of reference to recent movies and celebrity events
as well as inordinate discussion of clothes and other possible purchases.
Luckily, one of them had a baby in tow, and this gave us a connection to planet
earth, as I shared the warmth for the child, loved their stories, and joined in
their love. In other contexts, sport can be the conversation saviour.
I was happy
enough to be dumped in the café for a couple of hours to read my magazines over
a coffee or two while the others shopped. But I just could not conceive of ever
feeling that the place was anywhere I could ever positively want to be. For me,
shopping is a chore to be dealt with quickly and efficiently, even on an
occasion where I’m buying something fun. Outlet malls are versions of hell on
my planet.
Movies
often affect me the same way. Even adverts or trailers confuse me when they are
not making me angry. Who could want to see all that violence – I never want to
see a gun, in real life or in a movie. What about all those cartoons and aliens
and super-heroes? Humanity is endlessly fascinating in its everyday stories, so
why can’t we have more movies about those?
I could go
on, of course. But I need to be careful. Is it a good thing to be on another
planet, or does it just mean I’ve become old and judging and set in my ways? I
rather like my planet, and I do try to avoid stopping you from enjoying yours –
well, most of the time, when I’m not feeling grumpy or acting smug.
Actually, I
think one of the biggest changes in society over the last generation is the
extent to which we all live on our own private planets. Technology and changes
in media are the main reasons.
When I was
growing up, we encountered a narrower range of experiences. On Christmas
evening, almost everyone in the UK settled down to watch The Morecambe and Wise
Christmas show, and for the following weeks everyone talked about it. We all
watched the same news on TV, and had similar frames for the world as a result. We
were all suspicious of minorities because we had little direct experience of
them.
Nowadays we
are free to create our own planet, and most of us do. In my own family,
everyone follows their own preferences on their own screens, and, while we try
hard to share meals and conversation, there are more distractions than before.
On balance, this creates opportunity and joy that more outweighs the loss of
sharing a more uniform, compliant planet.
But living
in a bubble has its risks. We see it in politics, where most of us form fixed
opinions and seek and find reinforcement rather than challenge. This summer I
shared dinner with a guy whose planet seemed from a different universe, full of
conspiracy theories and certainty of what seemed outrageous claims. Afterwards
I rationalised that this guy had a job where he was usually in his car, and I
guess he followed talk radio. He was certainly confident, unshakeable even, and
rather angry and sad and scary too.
It’s hard
to see how to counter the downsides of personal planets at a societal level.
Morecambe and Wise were great, but today’s variety is even better, for all of
us. We shouldn’t try to regulate freedom, even if the result is Trump. Perhaps
one day the technology will advance to make it easier to communicate between
our planets. In the meantime, the best we can do, as usual, is to start with
ourselves.
In Shell,
for a long time my favourite advice to those I coached was to keep challenging
assumptions. We have to make assumptions all the time in order to simplify our
worlds, but we go wrong when those assumptions become too fixed, we should
always remember they are hypotheses not fixed pillars.
There are
many ways to do this. We can actively seek difference in our lives, and then be
open to listening and learning its lessons. While technology makes it possible
and even tempting to narrow our lives, it also offers possibilities to broaden
them.
I try
really hard to be listening and learning whenever I have the chance to be with
people of different outlooks. Being with the youthful crowd at the summer choir
festival is a blessing, and so is spending time at the old folks home where we
volunteer. I also remember well the year or so when I regularly attended
meetings of a twelve-step programme, where the background of my peers was
generally very different from my own. Once, I asked an open question of the
room, and a lady that I had always disregarded and probably judged adversely
for her lack of education and erudition answered me with stunning wisdom. That
lesson has stayed with me as much as anything else from the programme – that
wisdom can come from surprising places, indeed the more surprising the place,
the greater the potential value. I wish I could say that I apply that lesson
all the time and no longer disregard or judge – but I cannot.
We can do
the same with what we choose to read or watch or discuss. I’ve never agreed
with the social nicety that topics like politics or religion should be avoided
with strangers – indeed strangers have the most to teach us. Diverse opinion is
always healthy, even if most of the time we choose to disagree.
At Shell, I
learned a useful technique called Outrageous Opposites. One way to examine a
claim or mindset is to reframe it as its direct opposite, and see how that
makes you feel. An example is when I read articles about Russia or Iran.
Sometimes I try to think myself into the mind of a Russian or an Iranian reader,
with the article altered to replace their own country by the US.
Behind all
of this is an open mind and a listening and learning stance. Perhaps the most
dangerous consequence of this age of technology is the way it stops us
listening. While our headphones are on, we are not usually taking in the rest
of our environment.
When I left
Shell, I asked a few people who had done the same what they missed most. The
most common answer was the people; specifically the intelligent challenge that Shell
people brought to life. Perhaps they were right, and part of my occasional
frustration with life today on Planet Graham is that more days are spent
confused in shopping malls and fewer engrossed in smart conversation. But
actually I wonder if the opposite is true. Planet Shell has just as many
pitfalls – it is diverse but not as diverse as humanity, and it probably
colours our judgements and restricts our curiosity.
In the
meantime, if you spot someone looking sullen in a mall café reading The
Economist or a similar magazine, please try to strike up a conversation. You’ll
probably be judged pejoratively and rebuffed. But maybe, just maybe, our
respective planets can find a temporary common orbit to the benefit of both of
us.
No comments:
Post a Comment