I have been reading and thinking a bit more
about needs this week. And the more I have studied them, the less I like them.
A need is defined as a requirement to live
a healthy life. Most of Maslow’s needs fall into that category. Clearly we all
need food and shelter and clothes and so on. There are also needs that
evolution has presented us to preserve the species, sex being the most obvious
example.
The next category is also positive, but
might be better described as universal human goals rather than needs. These are
things like rudimentary healthcare, a basic education, support through
childhood and in old age, and personal security. When we consider that in the
West we are the first generation to enjoy those basic goals, and that much of
the world still lives without them, we should pause to consider whether we have
much right to even think about whether we need any more.
But more there are, and the next category
is still full of laudable goals at the level of humanity, although we have to
be careful about calling them rights and they become marginal against the
definition of a requirement for a healthy life. These are things like freedom
of movement, fair access to the rule of law, religious freedom, functioning
democracy, equality of opportunity, and something akin to societal dignity.
Hardly anyone enjoys these goals in totality, yet great progress has been made
and it is a fair quest to base a political philosophy around them. Indeed, that
is exactly the basis of my own politics.
But there is a difference at a personal
level. None of these things can really be described as needs. We have limited
control over them. If we start thinking of them as rights, we become strident
and demanding, and may forget the blessings we enjoy. By all means we can speak
against those denying us such freedoms, but we should be careful with our
expectations.
The same is true with another group of
goals that many fall into the trap of considering needs, items at a more
personal level. These are things like the love and loyalty of a partner, and
also of our parents and children. We can include concepts like peace, or
respect, or justice, or even happiness. We can also add in health, and
something about personal growth. Once we have the universal human goals in
place, this list is a key driver of fulfillment, much more so than the
political and societal list, but it is still a mistake to consider them as
needs.
This is because they are generally
outcomes, areas where we can influence but not control, and where any
expectation can only lead to disappointment. These are blessings, not needs or
rights. We can’t demand them or ensure them. Our best strategy, if we can
achieve it, is to forget all about this list as needs for ourselves, but use it
as a basis for how we treat others. We can’t do much to secure tem for
ourselves, but we can do a lot to help others secure many of these blessings. We
have no right at all to demand them or expect them, but we can give them, and
graciously accept any blessings that come back our way as a result.
All of this is a preamble to reconsider the
needs of David McClelland, of achievement, affiliation and power. Don’t these
all seem very selfish set against all the needs above?
So it is folly to call any of these needs.
But we can still acknowledge them as preferences and learn from them. To recap,
most of us have one dominant need among the three. However, unlike things like
Myers Briggs our preferences are not claimed to be innate but can be influenced
by culture and can also change over time.
Someone with high achievement need often
likes to work alone and loves challenging but attainable goals. Someone with
high affiliation looks for acceptance from a group. Power need is a bit more
complex, and encompasses a need for status, control and also a need to
influence an outcome through others.
Achievement motivated people can make
excellent subordinates, while the most effective leaders usually have power
motivation, notably the influencing kind. One pitfall is that achievement (or affiliation)
motivated people can progress based on competences that become irrelevant in
more senior positions.
A bit of ambition is good, especially when
young. Ambition leads to innovation and progress. Goals are important, and
desires and dreams are fine. Let’s just avoid the trap of these good things
becoming needs. For it is easy to see how each can lead to trouble.
An achievement need is fine while the goals
are clear and our powers remain strong. Perhaps many engineers are achievement
motivated, for the complaint I heard most often from them in Shell was about a
lack of clarity. Well, sorry, life is not simple and clarity can always be
given. Expecting others to bend their own goals to meet our selfish demand for
clarity will lead to disappointment all round. And what about when we get a bit
older or if we start to fail a bit? We get more and more disappointed. Perhaps
we will become even more single-minded, and locking out our loved ones from our
lives and our feelings. A failing achiever is not much fun for him- or herself
nor for those around them.
An affiliation need can be even more
damaging as we mature. This need might seem softer and more supportive of
others, but can become the most needy need of all. What right have we to shape
any group to support our need to belong? In parts of our lives, maturity brings
responsibility, which entails tough love of others and accepting some risk,
neither of which are served by an affiliation need. Then, as we grow older, we
can also be lonelier, as our groups disintegrate and habits and technology move
on.
The need for power can do the most obvious
damage. Status and respect must be earned and re-earned, while those with power
can require ever more of it. That leads to abuse, corruption, and disillusion.
It is rare to see someone graciously hand over power and then be able to thrive
without it. And much power can wane with age: look at those people (usually
women) of a certain age who have used their sexual power relentlessly until
they discover it has left them.
So I have concluded that all these needs
are really curses. When my team did the assessment exercise all those years
ago, our boss came out as high in all three needs categories. At the time, we
were in awe and a bit jealous. But looking back I can see how he was already
suffering then and probably suffered more later as disappointments inevitably
followed expectations. Apparently US President Eisenhower was assessed as low
in all three categories. That made him lucky and perhaps effective as well.
Somehow, I seem to have managed to dampen
my own needs. Probably having a breakdown at forty helped me take distance and
find alternative avenues. The subconscious choice to focus on developing others
was serendipitous. Later, I’ve been surrounded by great role models, and
probably religion has helped too. Of course, being blessed with all the more
basic true needs makes everything else a lot easier. I still have many ugly and
unreasonable needs, but they seem less than they used to be or might still have
been without these lucky breaks.
So there may be several useful lessons
here. A smart goal in life, at least past thirty, might be to find ways to
suppress needs, beyond the most basic ones. To do this, it helps to understand
where our needs are. Then we can seek help from others, or at least find
alternative ways to satisfy our needs that are more robust as we mature.
So we have a full agenda here. Follow a
political philosophy to support universal human goals without letting the
stridency of needs get in the way. Do whatever we can to help others achieve
their hopes for love, peace and respect, without demanding the same for
ourselves, always remembering to count our many blessings. And recognize and
work to suppress our need for achievement, affiliation or power as we mature.
Society does little to help us in any part of this agenda, but it feels like a
good one to follow. Thank you, Mr. McClelland. I don’t like your language, and
I learned little from your theory the first time around, but now you have
really helped me.
No comments:
Post a Comment